
Some issues in the other inputs will affect the repair:
– **Brief and research don’t match.** The content plan targets ”schampo för färgat hår” with a blue-tone and Kérastase Chroma Absolu angle, while the research notes focus on silver shampoo comparisons. Gate 2 will flag contract questions the article doesn’t answer, and I’ll need to know which brief governs.
– **Several sources are dated in the future or unverifiable.** Testkompassen (2026-09-29), Hotdrops (2026-10-28), and Testix (2026-10-16) are listed with dates I can’t check against today’s date. Gate 7 needs a real `datePublished`, and I’ll hedge or flag these citations if they can’t be confirmed.
– **The Lyko test has no date** (`ej angivet`), and the research notes say its publication date couldn’t be verified.
– **Source tier share fails its gate.** `tier_1_2_share_min_60pct` is `false`, so Gate 6 and the source-count requirement may need the article to cite more tier-2 sources or to note the gap.
– **Internal links are weak.** The Amanda Lind piece is a celebrity-hair article, not evergreen guidance, so it may fail the link-relevance requirement (`internal_link_relevance_required`). I’ll use the R+Co link where it fits and drop the other unless the article has a clear hook for it.
– **Gate 7 needs a canonical URL and slug.** The site is `https://ledarpunkten.se/`, but no article slug is given, so I’ll need the slug or I’ll have to derive it from the H1.







