Gate 1 allows reconstructing the article from the research notes if it’s missing. I haven’t done that because the content plan and the research notes disagree in ways that would force me to invent or choose facts:
– **Figures not in the research:** The content plan’s ”över 60 000” (juli 2025), ”runt 71 000” (29 januari 2026), and ”29 000-siffran” have no matching entries in the research facts. The research’s earliest data point is 21 maj 2026 (72 775).
– **Be’eri (97 civila):** This appears only in the content plan, not in the research facts.
– **Muslims in Israel (CBS):** The content plan requires this section, but the research contains no CBS data.
– **Label conflict:** The research labels 74 609 (2 nov 2026) as ”senaste,” but the verified facts include a later figure of 74 618 (4 nov 2026). Gate 4 would replace the older figure with the newer one, so I’d use 74 618 as the latest.
– **Child deaths:** The content plan says barn-siffror should be tied to the ministry count, but the research only has UNICEF’s figure (over 265 since the ceasefire) and says no fixed child total exists.
– **Tier share:** The research flags that tier 1–2 sources fall short of 60%, and there are fewer than 18 unique sources, so the must-cite and diversity requirements need checking.
If you want a reconstruction instead, confirm that I should build the article only from the research facts, and that the uncovered questions (Be’eri, CBS Muslim share, and the 60 000/71 000 figures) should be dropped or marked as unsourced.
Relaterade artiklar
Erik Vester är reporter på Ledarpunkten och bevakar dagliga kultur- och nöjesnyheter.