The ”Raw article (P2 output)” field is empty, so there is no HTML to repair. Please paste the P2 article and I’ll run the 14 gates and the intro and whitespace checks on it.

Senaste artiklar

I checked the research notes and content plan against the gates and found these issues the repair will need to handle:

– **Testfakta date conflict.** The Testfakta test is from 2015-07, and the notes say it is not a 2026 test. Any Testfakta figures in the article (Apolosophy 4,8; Nivea 4,6 with two allergens) must be dated 2015, not presented as current. Gate 4 may not fix this, since it only replaces values, so the date label needs a separate check.
– **Unsourced counts.** ”Råd & Rön har testat 8 solkrämer” and ”Bäst i Test listar 17 produkter” appear in the content plan but not in any fact or verified fact. Under Gate 3 they need a named source or must move to the rumor list. I found no source for them in the research.
– **Confidence mismatch.** Research confidence is low, but the plan lists items under ”confirmed” that rest on tier-3 or low-confidence sources. Gates 10 and 11 require these to be hedged or moved.
– **Unverifiable plan entries.** Eucerin Sun Kids and Evy Sunscreen Mousse appear in the H2 claims, but no fact in the research supports them.
– **Missing publication date.** I don’t know today’s date, so the NewsArticle `datePublished` and `dateModified` values in Gate 7 need it from you. I won’t guess it.
– **Tier-1 share.** Only Apoteket is tier 1. The notes say the tier 1–2 share is below 60%, so Gate 6’s diversity check and the content plan’s source requirement won’t pass as written.

If the P2 article doesn’t exist yet, I can reconstruct a full article from the research notes instead. That would be roughly 2,500 words with the required tables, snapshot cards, blockquotes and FAQ, and it would hedge or drop the unsourced items above. Tell me which route you want.